Nerdy Money: Bitcoin, the Private Digital Currency, and ...

Open Letter to Forbes Peter Cohan

Sent to: [email protected]
I've read your article on Forbes about Bitcoin: http://blogs.forbes.com/petercohan/2011/06/28/can-bitcoin-survive-is-it-legal/
I think the article could be better, and I'll outline the reasons below.
Corrections
dropped from $17.50 to “pennies”
One exchange (out of several) experienced technical difficulties (related to being hacked) and suspended trading for a week. Other exchanges kept trading and held the exchange value between 14$-17$. It currently trades at 16.8$.
used to buy Alpaca wool socks and illegal drugs
There is a wide variety of goods&services that's growing daily that you can pay for with Bitcoins. Among them are PC-hardware, Coffee in NYC, IT Consulting, Programming, Webdesign, Web-Hosting and many more.
Comparision to other "e-currencies" not thought trough
have been many attempts at creating online currencies — including Digicash, Flooz, and Beenz.
It isn't exactly relevant to compare Bitcoin to these currencies.
Beenz and Flooz were value substitutes entirely controlled by a single party. They could only be exchanged by involving that party. Inevitably these parties fell on hard times at some point or another, and had to cease operating, at which point exchange became impossible. That makes them a bad comparision to Bitcoin which is guaranteed not to fall prey to central control and floundering businesses that'd make their exchange impossible.
Digicash may have been somewhat similar to Bitcoin, but there are two key differences. Digicash may have been anonymous and somewhat decentralized in exchange, yet the minting of new coins and the client software itself were in the control of a single party. Inevitably when Digicash failed (to run a sound business) Digicash (the currency) became impossible to trade.
Therefore the comparision of Bitcoin with these failed "e-currencies" is only insofar of interest as it provides ample evidence of what exactly Bitcoin did better, namely two things:
Small change is irrelevant to the discussion of Bitcoin
A historical look at currencies over the last 500 years reveals an interesting insight — a key limiting factor to adopting currencies has been the ability to make small change.
The smallest unit of bitcoins is 0.00000001 btc. (https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/FAQ#How_divisible_are_Bitcoins?). At currently traded (16.8$/btc) that would be 0.000000168$. Bitcoin payments can be specified down to that smallest unit, and there does not have to be any "change". Therefore both the numeration and the precision of payment argument is not relevant.
Marginal costs and benefits misconception
But they never caught on because their marginal costs to consumers and merchants exceeded their marginal benefits.
In order to understand the motivation behind bitcoin, it's important to understand the limitations (or costs) of CC and Paypal payment processors.
The Paypal issues
The CC in general issues
*What Bitcoin does better
In Summary
Repeated misleading allusions as to questionable legality
Is It Legal? as a way to pay anonymously for illegal drugs sold on Silk Road – is the one that has been referred to the U.S. Attorney General as a violation of money laundering statutes. Mann notes that Bitcoin’s ultimate ambition well might be illegal After all, he points out, there are federal statutes that make it illegal to produce a separate currency.
Two main thrusts are presented by you as to the legality of Bitcoins. First you question businesses that use them of being in violation of money laundering laws. Second you allude to the legality of alternative currencies. Both of these things are not issues for the following reasons:
Consumers and Merchants pickup
Unless consumers and merchants can be persuaded that adopting it will make them better off, it’s likely to go the way of other online currencies.
This is an astute observation and I applaud it for that.
However as a system Bitcoins do not depend (financially) on that pickup, and the speculative part of the Bitcoin economy will be able to live quite a while entirely without it. That being said, there is some pickup of bitcoin in genuine e-commerce and other fields.
Closing
Bitcoin has many desirable qualities, from an organizational, economic and technical point of view. Your article is not a very good representation of Bitcoin as it is, nor of what it can be, or what it's core issues really are.
I'd invite you to write a retraction and correction in your next article and consult a Bitcoin specialist for review and input. If against all "odds" Bitcoin should prove to be more successful then you thought, think of it as collateral for your journalistic integrity.
You can read comments about this open letter on the reddit post about it: http://www.reddit.com/Bitcoin/comments/ic92x/open_letter_to_forbes_peter_cohan/
Kind Regards, Florian Bösch
TL;DR Peter Cohan has a poor grasp of bitcoins and presents a number of fallacious arguments that are not relevant.
submitted by pyalot to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

YouTube BITCOIN TO $42,000 BY December!!!  4,000,000 BTC Lost Forever!! Bitcoin: A Swiss Bank for Everyone's Pocket - YouTube Yikes! Watch This Bitcoin Investor RAGE in Front of a Live Audience [Emotional] Bitcoin Is Just Getting Started! - How Bitcoin Will Return To ATH And Beyond Within 24 Months

Originally founded by Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin is the first and most widely used decentralized ledger currency with the highest market capitalization. Its purpose is to provide a peer-to-peer payment system without the need for a third party. Any changes are decided democratically by the community. Its current development is led by Wladimir J ... Submit malware for free analysis with Falcon Sandbox and Hybrid Analysis technology. Hybrid Analysis develops and licenses analysis tools to fight malware. INTRO is an Ecosystem for real estate market players. Already today, the system has more than 6800 objects from 1800 developers, which you can buy with a discount of up to 30%. We are ready to scale our business to the global market. r/Bitcoin: A community dedicated to Bitcoin, the currency of the Internet. Bitcoin is a distributed, worldwide, decentralized digital money … General. All currencies require some sort of foundation that serves as a backing for the currency. In the United States it used to be silver and/or gold, now it is simply trust in the “credit” of the United States government that offers security in investing in the U.S. Dollar. Enter Bitcoin, which is an electronic currency that was created to operate without a central authority and which ...

[index] [16675] [11339] [33754] [11171] [14910] [21581] [6851] [10971] [4980] [2834]

YouTube

Bitcoin Technical Analysis & Bitcoin News Today: Also, I'll use technical analysis on the Bitcoin price to make a Bitcoin price prediction. Watch the video to learn more! 1:00 Bitcoin 5:53 BTC ... Could Bitcoin be preparing for a suprise move the few people have considered? In this video I explain what is worrying me right now about Bitcoin, and what t... In today's video, we discuss how Bitcoin will most certainly return to its all time high of $20,000 - and even farther. How and when will this happen? We discuss this and more in today's Bitcoin ... video, sharing, camera phone, video phone, free, upload During volatile market conditions, investors should be looking for assets that represent stores of value, like gold, silver, and bitcoin, this according to M...

#